All Tools
Free ToolAnalyzer

Email Snippet Personalizer

An opening that could apply to any prospect is a tell. This tool scores how prospect-specific your opening actually is.

Personalization score: 45/100

Some specificity but still leaning generic. Add one more concrete signal.

You analyzed one send. Outsolvi analyzes every send, forever.

Subject scores, preview tests, header parses are one-shot. Outsolvi runs the same analysis on every email you send and surfaces patterns: which subjects open, which preheaders convert, which threads stall. From $7/user/mo yearly.

Get the continuous version
What it does

Counts proper nouns, specific events/numbers, and personal references vs generic phrases. Returns a 0-100 personalization score.

When to use

Before sending a cold email. If you score below 40, the opening is template-y and won't earn the read.

FAQ

How is the score calculated?+

It starts at 100 and subtracts points for known filler phrases like hope you're doing well, circling back, and just following up, plus a penalty for merge tags you forgot to fill. It adds points back for dollar amounts, four-digit numbers, and proper names.

Can a high score still be a bad email?+

Yes. It matches text patterns, it doesn't verify facts. A specific detail you invented scores exactly the same as one you researched, so the score tells you the opening reads specific, not that it's true.

What score should I aim for?+

Below 40 the opening is template-y enough that it could go to anyone. Between 40 and 70 it has some specificity but still leans generic. At 70 and above it reads as researched.

Nate SummersCo-Founder, Outsolvi

Nate built Outsolvi after watching every email-tracking tool he had ever used lie to him about opens. Outsolvi runs Tier 1 to 5 confidence scoring on every open, native in Outlook and Gmail, so the number on the dashboard is one a rep can actually act on.

Last reviewed May 25, 2026Editorially independent

We update these pages when the underlying mechanics change. new mailbox-provider rules, new tracker behavior, new measurement gaps. The dates above are real revisions, not auto-touches.